Patrick Mehlen, Apoptosis, Cancer and Development Laboratory – Equipe labelisée “La Ligue”, LabEx DEVweCAN, Centre de Cancérologies de Lyon, INSERM U1052

Dependence receptors: Transforming an original mechanism for cell death into a novel anti-cancer strategy in patients with advanced cancers

The discovery of the first dependence receptor (DR) in 1998 [1] challenged the general dogma on transmembrane receptors, active only in the presence of their ligand. Indeed, our team unveiled receptors functioning in an either/or context rather than as conventional on/off switches. In effect, ligand-bound receptors activate a so-called “positive” signaling (proliferation, survival, differentiation), while unbound receptors transmit a “negative” pro-apoptotic signal (Figure 1). Hence, cells expressing DRs on their surface are dependent on the ligand for their survival, and these receptors have accordingly been termed “dependence receptors”. Currently, the DR family comprises around 20 members, homologous in their dual functionality. These known receptors may have one or several known ligands, and inversely a ligand may bind one or several receptors (Table 1).

Table 1: Table of the known Dependence Receptors and their respective ligands.

Dependence Receptor




Deleted in colorectal cancer (DCC)



Uncoordinated homologs (UNC5H1, 2, 3, 4 or UNC5A, B, C, D)



Neogenin receptor


Repulsive guidance molecule (RGM)


Neutrophin receptor p75 (p75NTR)

Nerve growth factor (NGF)


Patched-1 (PTCH-1)

Sonic hedgehog (SHH)


Cell-adhesion molecule-related/Down-regulated by Oncogenes (CDON)

Sonic hedgehog (SHH)



Semaphorin-3E (Sema3E)


Rearranged during transfection (RET)

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF)


Tropomyosin receptor kinase (Trk) A




brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)



Neutrophine-3 (NT-3)


Ephrin type A receptor 4

Ephrin-B3 (EphB3)


MET or hepatocyte growth factor receptor (HGFR)



Insulin receptor (IR) and insulin growth factor 1 receptor (IGF-1R)

Insulin and insulin growth factor 1 (IGF1)


Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)

Jelly belly (Jeb)


Integrins α and β

2-{ethyl[(5-{[6-methyl-3-(1H-pyrazol-4-yl)imidazo[1,2-a]pyrazin-8-yl]amino}isothiazol-3-yl)methyl]amino}-2-methylpropan-1-ol (EML)



Dickkopf 1 (DKK1)



Jagged 1 (Jag-1)



Contactin 6 (CNTN-6)


All of the receptors described above, when engaged by their specific ligands, transduce different pathways leading to the induction of cell differentiation, migration, inter-cellular communication or cell survival. These “positive” signaling functions are generally well-described, several of which are briefly presented below (Table 2). However in the absence of ligand binding these DRs triggers caspase-dependent cell death through pro-apoptotic mechanisms that have been reviewed previously [20] (Figure 2).

Table 2: Table of the known signaling triggered by DRs

Receptor/ligand pair

Positive signaling induced




DCC or UNC5H/Netrin-1

PI3K and MAPK signaling pathway with a key role in axonal growth and orientation

[21] [22]

IR and IGF-1R/insulin and IGF-1

activate many pathways such as PI3K/Akt or Ras/MAPK required for glucose uptake, glycogen synthesis or proliferation



Ras activation, critical for hippocampus formation during the embryonic stage



Activation of notch3 on vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMC) is essential for VSMC maintenance and maturation via activation of a canonical pathway including Notch3 intracellular cleavage (NICD) and NICD-dependent transcription


Aside from their common dual functionality, DRs are all highly involved in embryonic development and tumorigenesis. Their expression in the latter case is generally a factor of good prognosis, and it is generally admitted that tumors have developed escape mechanisms to evade this pro-apoptotic signaling either via a decrease in DR expression or an increase in ligand availability. Indeed, DRs limit tumor progression by eliminating supernumerary cells in a limited ligand environment, and thus constitute a natural mechanism to control cell growth [26]. As a consequence, tumor cells capable of counteracting it will have acquired a selective advantage. Two major mechanisms have so far been identified to bypass this control of cell death, namely the (i) silencing of the DR or its pro-apoptotic signaling pathway, and (ii) the autocrine production of the ligand (Figure 3).

This review will detail how tumors are able to develop by impacting either DRs or their ligands, and how such an interaction has become a target for personalized cancer therapies.

How to suppress a natural tumor suppressor

The prototypical DR, deleted in colorectal carcinoma (DCC), was originally identified in 1990 [27], and its gene located on chromosome 18q, a region prone to loss of heterozygosity (LOH), is frequently absent in colorectal cancers and more generally in a large fraction of cancers, resulting in the reduction or in the loss of DCC expression [27]. This LOH is mainly found in advanced stages of the disease, and its frequency increases with tumor progression [28-31], suggesting a role for DCC in cancer progression rather than initiation. Experiments seeking to restore DCC expression in tumor or metastatic lines demonstrated a reduction in ganglion invasion and prevention of metastatic spread of these cells to the lungs [32-35], arguing in favor of its role as a tumor suppressor in the late phases of tumor progression. The loss of DCC expression has been demonstrated in a variety of cancers [3,36,37], and results not only from a LOH but also through the hypermethylation of its promoter [3,38,39]. Although its rate of somatic mutation is relatively low in colon cancers (10-15%) [21], DCC is frequently mutated in sun-induced melanomas [40] and a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in DCC has been identified in gallbladder cancer [37]. The role of DCC in cancer progression was first challenged in 1996 [21], prior to being associated with its DR function by our team in 1998 [1]. Mechanistically, we generated mice bearing a mutated DCC receptor with a non-functional pro-apoptotic activity. The absence of DCC-induced apoptosis was associated with the development of spontaneous intestinal tumors at low frequency and with increased adenocarcinoma when the DCC mutant mice were backcrossed with mice highly susceptible to spontaneous intestinal adenoma formation (APC mutant background) [41]. These DCC “death-dead” mutants displayed a tendency to develop both more colorectal cancers and lymphomas [42]. In another genetically-modified mouse model of mammary carcinoma based on the somatic inactivation of p53, the invalidation of DCC led to the appearance of metastases [43]. Hence, DCC, via its pro-apoptotic activity, is a strong tumor suppressor, and its mutation or suppression are highly advantageous for tumor cells.

Following the discovery of the role of this unique dual functioning DR in cancer progression, our team and others embarked in a research crusade to unveil other DRs potentially implicated in tumorigenesis. Uncoordinated homolog (UNC5H) receptors, in particular UNC5A, B and C, are often lost or greatly reduced in cancers [44,45]. The loss of expression of UNC5H in human primary tumors, as well as in cell lines, is mainly due to epigenetic mechanisms, such as the methylation of promoters [38,39,44,46]. Along this line, the promoter region of UNC5C is hypermethylated in nearly 80% of the colorectal tumors analyzed and its inactivation is associated with tumor aggressiveness [46]. In addition, invalidation of UNC5C is associated with intestinal tumor progression in mice [46]. Inversely, expression of UNC5A in various cancer cell lines, including colon cancer, reduces their ability to form colonies and induces apoptosis [47]. Moreover, UNC5A, B and D are p53 target genes, which participate in the pro-apoptotic activity of p53 [47,48,49].

Tropomyosin receptor kinase A was first identified as an oncogenic fusion protein [50–52], and this rearrangement is also found for TrkC in particular in congenital fibrosarcoma and acute myeloid leukemia [53,54]. Owing to their kinase activity, these receptors have been shown to play an important role in the biology of cancers, notably of neuronal or neuroendocrine origin. Surprisingly, despite their strong homology TrkA, B and C receptors behaved in a very dissimilar way. While TrkB is expressed in very aggressive tumors, the expression of TrkA and TrkC is associated with a good prognosis, at least in neuroblastoma and medulloblastoma [55,56]. These paradoxical findings are highly consistent with their dual functionality as DRs. Accordingly, as observed for netrin-1 receptors, TrkC is under-expressed in a large fraction of colorectal cancers in humans. This decreased expression is mainly due to promoter methylation [57]. However, to date, a functional demonstration that loss of TrkC or TrkA promotes tumor progression remains to be demonstrated mechanistically.

The Patched-1 receptor (PTCH-1), of the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) morphogen, is a well-known tumor suppressor [58]. Loss of PTCH-1 expression, or mutations leading to its inactivation, has been observed in basal cell carcinomas and medulloblastomas [59]. It is generally accepted that the tumor suppressor activity of PTCH-1 is related to its repression of a canonical oncogenic pathway (Smoothened-Gli). However it was more recently shown to reduce the tumorigenicity via its DR activity [6]. However, there is currently no evidence in vivo that PTCH-1 functions as a tumor suppressor by its pro-apoptotic activity. This has nonetheless been demonstrated for another SHH receptor, namely the CDON receiver. High throughput sequencing has shown many false-sense mutations of CDON in human cancers (Sanger Institute Catalog for Somatic Mutations in Cancer web site, In addition, loss of CDON expression has been observed in humans in tumors of the colon, kidney, lungs and breast [7]. Interestingly, the expression of CDON is inversely correlated with the tumor grade (according to the TNM classification) in colorectal cancers and mice mutated for CDON are prone to develop intestinal adenocarcinoma when backcrossed with APC mutant mice [7].

Among the other DRs, Kremen1, one of the latest to have been discovered, is down regulated in several cancers [17,60]. Mutations of Kremen1 in the domain responsible for the apoptotic activity induced by the receptor in the absence of its ligand DKK-1 were identified in cancer patients, supporting the view that these mutations confer a selective advantage for tumor cell survival [17]. Neurotrophin receptor p75 (p75NTR) is partially lost in the localized prostate tumor epithelium. This loss is inversely correlated with tumor grade (Gleason score) and total loss has been observed in metastatic prostate cancer lines [61,62]. Ephrin typr A receptor (EphA4) is down-regulated in invasive forms of breast cancer [99], in liver and kidney cancers [64] and in metastatic melanoma [65]. It has also been suggested that the expression of neogenin may be inversely correlated with malignancy in breast cancer [66]. Consistent with a tumor suppressor function, Notch3 is as also downregulated in breast cancer and this loss is associated with poor survival [67,68].

Overall, the association of these recently identified DRs with tumorigenesis is suspected, however, in most cases, animal models are lacking in order to demonstrate this role.

How to overwhelm tumor suppressors to foster cancer progression

Tumors have thus developed selective advantages to inactivate the natural tumor suppressive activity of DRs, and it was therefore speculated that tumor cells may also overwhelm DRs by producing larger amounts of ligand, conferring cancer cells with the ability to survive independently of ligand limitation and to increase “positive signaling”. Consistently, a growing body of evidence indicates that this "gain of ligand" occurs in many tumors, and is more particularly described for netrin-1, NT-3, SHH, Sema-3E, DKK-1 and Jagged-1.

In line with the first discoveries on DCC and cancer progression, the confirmation that a gain of ligand is associated with tumor progression was first obtained with DCC’s ligand netrin-1. Indeed, the ectopic expression of netrin-1 in the intestinal tract of mice was accompanied by a net decrease in epithelial apoptosis, and these mice had a significant increase in the development of spontaneous focal hyperplasia and adenomas. Moreover, when backcrossed with an APC mutant background, the mice developed more adenocarcinoma [69]. Netrin-1 is overexpressed in a large fraction of cancers [42,70-72], and this overexpression is associated with a poor prognosis in patients with poorly differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma [73]. In breast cancer, netrin-1 is correlated with the aggressiveness of the disease and especially with its metastatic potential. An experimental silencing of netrin-1 in various cancer cell lines showed that netrin-1 is associated with cell death in vitro and with tumor growth and metastasis inhibition in mice [74,75]. In vitro cell death and tumor growth inhibition in vivo were also observed when agents interfering the netrin-1/receptor binding were used [74-76], supporting the view that inhibition of netrin-1/DR interaction could be a promising therapeutic strategy. Mechanistically, the pathways underlying netrin-1 up-regulation remain largely unknown, though several studies have proposed diverse routes [76-81].

Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), ligand of TrkC, is overexpressed in a large fraction of advanced neuroblastoma, and this overexpression blocks the pro-apoptotic activity of TrkC in vitro in human neuroblastoma cell lines [82]. In addition, NT-3 silencing or the inhibition of NT-3/TrkC interaction via an antibody inhibits tumor growth and metastatic spread of human neuroblastoma in xenograft models in chicken and mice [82].

Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) is up-regulated in many cancers in an autocrine and paracrine manner [83,84]. Initially this overexpression was associated with activation of the so-called canonical pathway involving the activation of Gli transcription factors via smoothened (Smo). Nevertheless, while a potent inhibitor of the canonical pathway, the Smo antagonist, GDC-0449, has shown a beneficial effect in patients with basal cell carcinomas or medulloblastomas presenting activating mutations of the PTCH-1-Smo-Gli pathway, this drug has no effect in other tested cancers, even though patients were stratified according to SHH expression. Hence, SHH signaling was suggested to be more complex, involving its DR(s), by blocking their pro-apoptotic activity (especially CDON) [7]. Preclinical models demonstrated that inhibition of SHH/CDON interaction by a SHH titration (SHH-TRAP) could efficiently engage CDON-induced tumor cell death and could potentially benefit patients with tumors expressing SHH [7].

Semaphorin 3E (Sema-3E), ligand of the PlexinD1 receptor, is overexpressed in a large number of cancers, and most often associated with tumor progression. The expression of Sema-3E is associated with the metastatic capacity of ovarian, colon and melanoma cancers, and is correlated with poor survival of patients with colorectal and pancreatic cancers [85-87]. Sema-3E was initially identified as a gene expressed in metastatic breast adenocarcinoma cell lines, whereas it was expressed in only 30% of non-metastatic cell lines [88,89]. The pro-tumoral function of Sema-3E in cancer is controversial, as its overexpression in some models resulted in a decrease in neo-angiogenesis and a reduction in tumor growth [86,87,90], but overexpression of the Sema-3E cleavage fragment by furins contributed to tumor invasion and distant metastasis formation [86,87,91,92]. Since unveiling PlexinD1 as a DR, novel insight into the role of Sema-3E/PlexinD1 in cancer has been gained. Indeed, the autocrine production of Sema-3E was shown to increase the survival of breast cancer cell lines by inhibiting PlexinD1-activated pro-apoptotic signaling. Consequently, the use in preclinical models of TRAP, blocking the Sema-3E/PlexinD1 interaction, led to inhibition of tumor growth and metastasis [8].

The Dickkopf-1 (DKK-1) ligand of Kremen-1 is up-regulated in a number of cancers [93] and this over expression is correlated with poor prognosis [94-100]. Moreover, DKK-1 expression is correlated with cancer aggressiveness in myeloma patients [101]. Paradoxically, this overexpression was perceived as counter-intuitive as up-regulation of DKK-1 should be associated with inhibition of the Wnt pathway, a pro-oncogenic pathway. Once again, its implication as a DR ligand clarified this paradoxical overexpression [17]. Of interest, although not in the context of its role as a DR ligand, DKK-1 inhibition by either knock down or anti-DKK-1 antibodies approaches was considered as a potential cancer therapeutic strategy in a large panel of cancers [93,102]. Sato et al. showed that interference with DKK-1 with an anti-DKK-1 antibody could limit lung tumor growth in vivo and this was accompanied by extensive cancer cell death [93]. Furthermore, the use of an anti-DKK-1 antibody inhibited metastasis of osteosarcoma or of hepatocellular carcinoma in xenograft mice models [102,103] or multiple myeloma dissemination in immunodeficient mice transplanted with relevant organs of the human immune system (SCID-hu mice) [104].

Transposing a recently discovered concept to treat patients with advanced solid cancer

Based on the findings presented above, our team dedicated a significant workforce to transfer our fundamental/preclinical results into a clinical application interfering with ligand/DR interaction, in our case netrin-1/receptors. In effect, an anti-netrin-1 antibody was generated and showed some interesting anti-cancer activities in pre-clinical models [81,105]. This antibody was humanized and has been through all the regulatory preclinical stages. A phase 1 clinical trial launched in 2017 encompassing 60 patients with advanced solid tumors is ongoing (, and although it is too soon to conclude on the benefits of the anti-netrin-1 mAb, our preliminary data recently reported at ESMO (Cassier et al., Annal of Oncology, 2019) show an excellent safety profile with no dose-limiting toxicity and few adverse effects (i.e. mainly infusion-related reaction commonly seen for humanized antibodies). More importantly and even though next steps will be to explore more specifically target patients that may respond to the treatment, and to investigate whether combination treatments with standards-of-care such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy increase overall patient survival, we have seen some clear signs of clinical activity in patients with advanced cancers. It includes patients showing long-term disease stabilization (>18 months of treatment) or even objective response (shrinking of over 50% of tumoral lesions) (Figure 4). This supports the view that the dependence receptor concept may in the future provide promising solutions for the wellbeing of patients.


The authors thank the members of Dependence receptors, Cancer and Development Laboratory for their advice and contribution.


1 Mehlen P, Rabizadeh S, Snipas SJ, Assa-Munt N, Salvesen GS & Bredesen DE (1998) The DCC gene product induces apoptosis by a mechanism requiring receptor proteolysis. Nature 395, 801-804.

2 Llambi F, Causeret F, Bloch-Gallego E & Mehlen P (2001) Netrin-1 acts as a survival factor via its receptors UNC5H and DCC. EMBO J. 20, 2715-2722.

3 Arakawa H (2004) Netrin-1 and its receptors in tumorigenesis. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 978-987.

4 Matsunaga E, Tauszig-Delamasure S, Monnier PP, Mueller BK, Strittmatter SM, Mehlen P & Chédotal A (2004) RGM and its receptor neogenin regulate neuronal survival. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 749-755.

5 Rabizadeh S, Oh J, Zhong LT, Yang J, Bitler CM, Butcher LL & Bredesen DE (1993) Induction of apoptosis by the low-affinity NGF receptor. Science 261, 345-348.

6 Thibert C, Teillet M-A, Lapointe F, Mazelin L, Le Douarin NM & Mehlen P (2003) Inhibition of neuroepithelial patched-induced apoptosis by sonic hedgehog. Science 301, 843-846.

7 Delloye-Bourgeois C, Gibert B, Rama N, Delcros J-G, Gadot N, Scoazec J-Y, Krauss R, Bernet A & Mehlen P (2013) Sonic Hedgehog promotes tumor cell survival by inhibiting CDON pro-apoptotic activity. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001623.

8 Luchino J, Hocine M, Amoureux M-C, Gibert B, Bernet A, Royet A, Treilleux I, Lécine P, Borg J-P, Mehlen P, Chauvet S & Mann F (2013) Semaphorin 3E suppresses tumor cell death triggered by the plexin D1 dependence receptor in metastatic breast cancers. Cancer Cell 24, 673-685.

9 Bordeaux MC, Forcet C, Granger L, Corset V, Bidaud C, Billaud M, Bredesen DE, Edery P & Mehlen P (2000) The RET proto-oncogene induces apoptosis: a novel mechanism for Hirschsprung disease. EMBO J. 19, 4056-4063.

10 Tauszig-Delamasure S, Yu L-Y, Cabrera JR, Bouzas-Rodriguez J, Mermet-Bouvier C, Guix C, Bordeaux M-C, Arumäe U & Mehlen P (2007) The TrkC receptor induces apoptosis when the dependence receptor notion meets the neurotrophin paradigm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 13361-13366.

11 Nikoletopoulou V, Lickert H, Frade JM, Rencurel C, Giallonardo P, Zhang L, Bibel M & Barde Y-A (2010) Neurotrophin receptors TrkA and TrkC cause neuronal death whereas TrkB does not. Nature 467, 59-63.

12 Furne C, Ricard J, Cabrera JR, Pays L, Bethea JR, Mehlen P & Liebl DJ (2009) EphrinB3 is an anti-apoptotic ligand that inhibits the dependence receptor functions of EphA4 receptors during adult neurogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 231-238.

13 Tulasne D, Deheuninck J, Lourenco FC, Lamballe F, Ji Z, Leroy C, Puchois E, Moumen A, Maina F, Mehlen P & Fafeur V (2004) Proapoptotic function of the MET tyrosine kinase receptor through caspase cleavage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10328-10339.

14 Boucher J, Macotela Y, Bezy O, Mori MA, Kriauciunas K & Kahn CR (2010) A kinase-independent role for unoccupied insulin and IGF-1 receptors in the control of apoptosis. Sci Signal 3, ra87.

15 Mourali J, Bénard A, Lourenço FC, Monnet C, Greenland C, Moog-Lutz C, Racaud-Sultan C, Gonzalez-Dunia D, Vigny M, Mehlen P, Delsol G & Allouche M (2006) Anaplastic lymphoma kinase is a dependence receptor whose proapoptotic functions are activated by caspase cleavage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 6209-6222.

16 Stupack DG, Puente XS, Boutsaboualoy S, Storgard CM & Cheresh DA (2001) Apoptosis of adherent cells by recruitment of caspase-8 to unligated integrins. J. Cell Biol. 155, 459-470.

17 Causeret F, Sumia I & Pierani A (2016) Kremen1 and Dickkopf1 control cell survival in a Wnt-independent manner. Cell Death Differ. 23, 323-332.

18 Lin S, Negulescu A, Bulusu S, Gibert B, Delcros J-G, Ducarouge B, Rama N, Gadot N, Treilleux I, Saintigny P, Meurette O & Mehlen P (2017) Non-canonical NOTCH3 signalling limits tumour angiogenesis. Nat Commun 8, 16074.

19 Zuko A, Oguro-Ando A, Post H, Taggenbrock RLRE, van Dijk RE, Altelaar AFM, Heck AJR, Petrenko AG, van der Zwaag B, Shimoda Y, Pasterkamp RJ & Burbach JPH (2016) Association of Cell Adhesion Molecules Contactin-6 and Latrophilin-1 Regulates Neuronal Apoptosis. Front Mol Neurosci 9.

20 Negulescu AM, Mehlen P (2018) Dependence receptors - the dark side awakens. FEBS J. 285 (21):3909-3924

21 Fazeli A, Dickinson SL, Hermiston ML, Tighe RV, Steen RG, Small CG, Stoeckli ET, Keino-Masu K, Masu M, Rayburn H, Simons J, Bronson RT, Gordon JI, Tessier-Lavigne M & Weinberg RA (1997) Phenotype of mice lacking functional Deleted in colorectal cancer (Dcc) gene. Nature 386, 796-804.

22 Mehlen P & Furne C (2005) Netrin-1: when a neuronal guidance cue turns out to be a regulator of tumorigenesis. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 62, 2599-2616.

23 Siddle K (2011) Signalling by insulin and IGF receptors: supporting acts and new players. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 47, R1-10.

24 Mata A, Gil V, Pérez-Clausell J, Dasilva M, González-Calixto MC, Soriano E, García-Verdugo JM, Sanchez-Vives MV & Del Río JA (2018) New functions of Semaphorin 3E and its receptor PlexinD1 during developing and adult hippocampal formation. Sci Rep 8, 1381.

25 Liu H, Kennard S & Lilly B (2009) NOTCH3 expression is induced in mural cells through an autoregulatory loop that requires endothelial-expressed JAGGED1. Circ Res 104, 466-475.

26 Goldschneider D & Mehlen P (2010) Dependence receptors: a new paradigm in cell signaling and cancer therapy. Oncogene 29, 1865-1882.

27 Fearon ER, Cho KR, Nigro JM, Kern SE, Simons JW, Ruppert JM, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Thomas G & Kinzler KW (1990) Identification of a chromosome 18q gene that is altered in colorectal cancers. Science 247, 49-56.

28 Jen J, Kim H, Piantadosi S, Liu ZF, Levitt RC, Sistonen P, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B & Hamilton SR (1994) Allelic loss of chromosome 18q and prognosis in colorectal cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 331, 213-221.

29 Uchino S, Tsuda H, Noguchi M, Yokota J, Terada M, Saito T, Kobayashi M, Sugimura T & Hirohashi S (1992) Frequent loss of heterozygosity at the DCC locus in gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 52, 3099-3102.

30 Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Hamilton SR, Kern SE, Preisinger AC, Leppert M, Nakamura Y, White R, Smits AM & Bos JL (1988) Genetic alterations during colorectal-tumor development. N. Engl. J. Med. 319, 525-532.

31 Vogelstein B, Fearon ER, Kern SE, Hamilton SR, Preisinger AC, Nakamura Y & White R (1989) Allelotype of colorectal carcinomas. Science 244, 207-211.

32 Klingelhutz AJ, Smith PP, Garrett LR & McDougall JK (1993) Alteration of the DCC tumor-suppressor gene in tumorigenic HPV-18 immortalized human keratinocytes transformed by nitrosomethylurea. Oncogene 8, 95-99.

33 Velcich A, Corner G, Palumbo L & Augenlicht L (1999) Altered phenotype of HT29 colonic adenocarcinoma cells following expression of the DCC gene. Oncogene 18, 2599-2606.

34 Kato H, Zhou Y, Asanoma K, Kondo H, Yoshikawa Y, Watanabe K, Matsuda T, Wake N & Barrett JC (2000) Suppressed tumorigenicity of human endometrial cancer cells by the restored expression of the DCC gene. Br. J. Cancer 82, 459-466.

35 Rodrigues S, De Wever O, Bruyneel E, Rooney RJ & Gespach C (2007) Opposing roles of netrin-1 and the dependence receptor DCC in cancer cell invasion, tumor growth and metastasis. Oncogene 26, 5615-5625.

36 Mehlen P & Fearon ER (2004) Role of the dependence receptor DCC in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. J. Clin. Oncol. 22, 3420-3428.

37 Cha P-C, Zembutsu H, Takahashi A, Kubo M, Kamatani N & Nakamura Y (2012) A genome-wide association study identifies SNP in DCC is associated with gallbladder cancer in the Japanese population. J. Hum. Genet. 57, 235-237.

38 Hibi K, Mizukami H, Shirahata A, Goto T, Sakata M & Sanada Y (2009) Aberrant methylation of the netrin-1 receptor genes UNC5C and DCC detected in advanced colorectal cancer. World J Surg 33, 1053-1057.

39 Hibi K, Sakata M, Sakuraba K, Kitamura Y-H, Shirahata A, Goto T, Mizukami H, Saito M, Ishibashi K, Kigawa G, Nemoto H & Sanada Y (2010) Methylation of the DCC gene is lost in advanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Res. 30, 107-109.

40 Krauthammer M, Kong Y, Ha BH, Evans P, Bacchiocchi A, McCusker JP, Cheng E, Davis MJ, Goh G, Choi M, Ariyan S, Narayan D, Dutton-Regester K, Capatana A, Holman EC, Bosenberg M, Sznol M, Kluger HM, Brash DE, Stern DF, Materin MA, Lo RS, Mane S, Ma S, Kidd KK, Hayward NK, Lifton RP, Schlessinger J, Boggon TJ & Halaban R (2012) Exome sequencing identifies recurrent somatic RAC1 mutations in melanoma. Nat. Genet. 44, 1006-1014.

41 Castets M, Broutier L, Molin Y, Brevet M, Chazot G, Gadot N, Paquet A, Mazelin L, Jarrosson-Wuilleme L, Scoazec J-Y, Bernet A & Mehlen P (2011) DCC constrains tumour progression via its dependence receptor activity. Nature 482, 534-537.

42 Broutier L, Creveaux M, Vial J, Tortereau A, Delcros J-G, Chazot G, McCarron MJ, Léon S, Pangault C, Gadot N, Colombe A, Boulland M-L, Blachier J, Marie JC, Traverse-Glehen A, Donzé O, Chassagne-Clément C, Salles G, Tarte K, Mehlen P & Castets M (2016) Targeting netrin-1/DCC interaction in diffuse large B-cell and mantle cell lymphomas. EMBO Mol Med 8, 96-104.

43 Krimpenfort P, Song J-Y, Proost N, Zevenhoven J, Jonkers J & Berns A (2012) Deleted in colorectal carcinoma suppresses metastasis in p53-deficient mammary tumours. Nature 482, 538-541.

44 Shin Sk, Nagasaka T, Jung BH, Matsubara N, Ho Kim W, Carethers JM, Boland CR & Goel A (2007) Epigenetic and Genetic Alterations in Netrin-1 Receptors UNC5C and DCC in Human Colon Cancer. Gastroenterology 133, 1849-1857.

45 Thiebault K, Mazelin L, Pays L, Llambi F, Joly M-O, Scoazec J-Y, Saurin J-C, Romeo G & Mehlen P (2003) The netrin-1 receptors UNC5H are putative tumor suppressors controlling cell death commitment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 4173–4178.

46 Bernet A, Mazelin L, Coissieux M-M, Gadot N, Ackerman SL, Scoazec J-Y & Mehlen P (2007) Inactivation of the UNC5C Netrin-1 receptor is associated with tumor progression in colorectal malignancies. Gastroenterology 133, 1840-1848.

47 Miyamoto Y, Futamura M, Kitamura N, Nakamura Y, Baba H & Arakawa H (2010) Identification of UNC5A as a novel transcriptional target of tumor suppressor p53 and a regulator of apoptosis. Int. J. Oncol. 36, 1253-1260.

48 Tanikawa C, Matsuda K, Fukuda S, Nakamura Y & Arakawa H (2003) p53RDL1 regulates p53-dependent apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 216-223.

49 Wang H, Ozaki T, Shamim Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Kamijo T, Xue X & Nakagawara A (2008) A newly identified dependence receptor UNC5H4 is induced during DNA damage-mediated apoptosis and transcriptional target of tumor suppressor p53. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 370, 594-598.

50 Kaplan DR, Martin-Zanca D & Parada LF (1991) Tyrosine phosphorylation and tyrosine kinase activity of the trk proto-oncogene product induced by NGF. Nature 350, 158-160.

51 Martin-Zanca D, Hughes SH & Barbacid M (1986) A human oncogene formed by the fusion of truncated tropomyosin and protein tyrosine kinase sequences. Nature 319, 743-748.

52 Martin-Zanca D, Oskam R, Mitra G, Copeland T & Barbacid M (1989) Molecular and biochemical characterization of the human trk proto-oncogene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 9, 24-33.

53 Knezevich SR, McFadden DE, Tao W, Lim JF & Sorensen PH (1998) A novel ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion in congenital fibrosarcoma. Nat. Genet. 18, 184-187.

54 Eguchi M, Eguchi-Ishimae M, Tojo A, Morishita K, Suzuki K, Sato Y, Kudoh S, Tanaka K, Setoyama M, Nagamura F, Asano S & Kamada N (1999) Fusion of ETV6 to neurotrophin-3 receptor TRKC in acute myeloid leukemia with t(12;15)(p13;q25). Blood 93, 1355-1363.

55 Yamashiro DJ, Liu XG, Lee CP, Nakagawara A, Ikegaki N, McGregor LM, Baylin SB & Brodeur GM (1997) Expression and function of Trk-C in favourable human neuroblastomas. Eur. J. Cancer 33, 2054-2057.

56 Brodeur GM, Nakagawara A, Yamashiro DJ, Ikegaki N, Liu XG, Azar CG, Lee CP & Evans AE (1997) Expression of TrkA, TrkB and TrkC in human neuroblastomas. J. Neurooncol. 31, 49-55.

57 Genevois A-L, Ichim G, Coissieux M-M, Lambert M-P, Lavial F, Goldschneider D, Jarrosson-Wuilleme L, Lepinasse F, Gouysse G, Herceg Z, Scoazec J-Y, Tauszig-Delamasure S & Mehlen P (2013) Dependence receptor TrkC is a putative colon cancer tumor suppressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 3017-3022.

58 Stone DM, Hynes M, Armanini M, Swanson TA, Gu Q, Johnson RL, Scott MP, Pennica D, Goddard A, Phillips H, Noll M, Hooper JE, de Sauvage F & Rosenthal A (1996) The tumour-suppressor gene patched encodes a candidate receptor for Sonic hedgehog. Nature 384, 129-134.

59 Wicking C & McGlinn E (2001) The role of hedgehog signalling in tumorigenesis. Cancer Lett. 173, 1-7.

60 Nakamura T, Nakamura T & Matsumoto K (2008) The functions and possible significance of Kremen as the gatekeeper of Wnt signalling in development and pathology. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 12, 391-408.

61 Pflug BR, Onoda M, Lynch JH & Djakiew D (1992) Reduced expression of the low affinity nerve growth factor receptor in benign and malignant human prostate tissue and loss of expression in four human metastatic prostate tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 52, 5403-5406.

62 Perez M, Regan T, Pflug B, Lynch J & Djakiew D (1997) Loss of low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor during malignant transformation of the human prostate. Prostate 30, 274-279.

63 Fox BP & Kandpal RP (2004) Invasiveness of breast carcinoma cells and transcript profile: Eph receptors and ephrin ligands as molecular markers of potential diagnostic and prognostic application. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 882-892.

64 Hafner C, Schmitz G, Meyer S, Bataille F, Hau P, Langmann T, Dietmaier W, Landthaler M & Vogt T (2004) Differential gene expression of Eph receptors and ephrins in benign human tissues and cancers. Clin. Chem. 50, 490-499.

65 Easty DJ, Mitchell PJ, Patel K, Flørenes VA, Spritz RA & Bennett DC (1997) Loss of expression of receptor tyrosine kinase family genes PTK7 and SEK in metastatic melanoma. Int. J. Cancer 71, 1061-1065.

66 Lee JE, Kim HJ, Bae JY, Kim SW, Park J-S, Shin HJ, Han W, Kim S-W, Kang K-S & Noh D-Y (2005) Neogenin expression may be inversely correlated to the tumorigenicity of human breast cancer. BMC Cancer 5, 154.

67 Cui H, Kong Y, Xu M & Zhang H (2013) Notch3 functions as a tumor suppressor by controlling cellular senescence. Cancer Res. 73, 3451-3459.

68 Zhang X, Liu X, Luo J, Xiao W, Ye X, Chen M, Li Y & Zhang G-J (2016) Notch3 inhibits epithelial–mesenchymal transition by activating Kibra-mediated Hippo/YAP signaling in breast cancer epithelial cells. Oncogenesis 5, e269.

69 Mazelin L, Bernet A, Bonod-Bidaud C, Pays L, Arnaud S, Gespach C, Bredesen DE, Scoazec J-Y & Mehlen P (2004) Netrin-1 controls colorectal tumorigenesis by regulating apoptosis. Nature 431, 80-84.

70 Ramesh G, Berg A & Jayakumar C (2011) Plasma netrin-1 is a diagnostic biomarker of human cancers. Biomarkers 16, 172-180.

71 Harter PN, Zinke J, Scholz A, Tichy J, Zachskorn C, Kvasnicka HM, Goeppert B, Delloye-Bourgeois C, Hattingen E, Senft C, Steinbach JP, Plate KH, Mehlen P, Schulte D & Mittelbronn M (2014) Netrin-1 Expression Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Poor Patient Survival in Brain Metastases. PLOS ONE 9, e92311.

72 Papanastasiou AD, Pampalakis G, Katsaros D & Sotiropoulou G (2011) Netrin-1 overexpression is predictive of ovarian malignancies. Oncotarget 2, 363-367.

73 Link B-C, Reichelt U, Schreiber M, Kaifi JT, Wachowiak R, Bogoevski D, Bubenheim M, Cataldegirmen G, Gawad KA, Issa R, Koops S, Izbicki JR & Yekebas EF (2007) Prognostic implications of netrin-1 expression and its receptors in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 14, 2591-2599.

74 Fitamant J, Guenebeaud C, Coissieux M-M, Guix C, Treilleux I, Scoazec J-Y, Bachelot T, Bernet A & Mehlen P (2008) Netrin-1 expression confers a selective advantage for tumor cell survival in metastatic breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4850-4855.

75 Delloye-Bourgeois C, Fitamant J, Paradisi A, Cappellen D, Douc-Rasy S, Raquin M-A, Stupack D, Nakagawara A, Rousseau R, Combaret V, Puisieux A, Valteau-Couanet D, Bénard J, Bernet A & Mehlen P (2009) Netrin-1 acts as a survival factor for aggressive neuroblastoma. J. Exp. Med. 206, 833-847.

76 Paradisi A, Creveaux M, Gibert B, Devailly G, Redoulez E, Neves D, Cleyssac E, Treilleux I, Klein C, Niederfellner G, Cassier PA, Bernet A & Mehlen P (2013) Combining chemotherapeutic agents and netrin-1 interference potentiates cancer cell death. EMBO Mol Med 5, 1821-1834.

77 Paradisi A, Maisse C, Bernet A, Coissieux M-M, Maccarrone M, Scoazec J-Y & Mehlen P (2008) NF-kappaB regulates netrin-1 expression and affects the conditional tumor suppressive activity of the netrin-1 receptors. Gastroenterology 135, 1248-1257.

78 Karin M, Cao Y, Greten FR & Li Z-W (2002) NF-kappaB in cancer: from innocent bystander to major culprit. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 301-310.

79 Paradisi A, Maisse C, Coissieux M-M, Gadot N, Lépinasse F, Delloye-Bourgeois C, Delcros J-G, Svrcek M, Neufert C, Fléjou J-F, Scoazec J-Y & Mehlen P (2009) Netrin-1 up-regulation in inflammatory bowel diseases is required for colorectal cancer progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 17146-17151.

80 Grandin M, Mathot P, Devailly G, Bidet Y, Ghantous A, Favrot C, Gibert B, Gadot N, Puisieux I, Herceg Z, Delcros J-G, Bernet A, Mehlen P & Dante R (2016) Inhibition of DNA methylation promotes breast tumor sensitivity to netrin-1 interference. EMBO Mol Med 8, 863-877.

81 Grandin M, Meier M, Delcros JG, Nikodemus D, Reuten R, Patel TR, Goldschneider D, Orriss G, Krahn N, Boussouar A, Abes R, Dean Y, Neves D, Bernet A, Depil S, Schneiders F, Poole K, Dante R, Koch M, Mehlen P & Stetefeld J (2016) Structural Decoding of the Netrin-1/UNC5 Interaction and its Therapeutical Implications in Cancers. Cancer Cell 29, 173-185.

82 Bouzas-Rodriguez J, Cabrera JR, Delloye-Bourgeois C, Ichim G, Delcros J-G, Raquin M-A, Rousseau R, Combaret V, Bénard J, Tauszig-Delamasure S & Mehlen P (2010) Neurotrophin-3 production promotes human neuroblastoma cell survival by inhibiting TrkC-induced apoptosis. J. Clin. Invest. 120, 850-858.

83 Varnat F, Duquet A, Malerba M, Zbinden M, Mas C, Gervaz P & Ruiz i Altaba A (2009) Human colon cancer epithelial cells harbour active HEDGEHOG-GLI signalling that is essential for tumour growth, recurrence, metastasis and stem cell survival and expansion. EMBO Mol Med 1, 338-351.

84 Barakat MT, Humke EW & Scott MP (2010) Learning from Jekyll to control Hyde: Hedgehog Signaling in Development and Cancer. Trends Mol Med 16, 337-348.

85 Biankin AV, Waddell N, Kassahn KS, Gingras M-C, Muthuswamy LB, Johns AL, Miller DK, Wilson PJ, Patch A-M, Wu J, Chang DK, Cowley MJ, Gardiner BB, Song S, Harliwong I, Idrisoglu S, Nourse C, Nourbakhsh E, Manning S, Wani S, Gongora M, Pajic M, Scarlett CJ, Gill AJ, Pinho AV, Rooman I, Anderson M, Holmes O, Leonard C, Taylor D, Wood S, Xu Q, Nones K, Fink JL, Christ A, Bruxner T, Cloonan N, Kolle G, Newell F, Pinese M, Mead RS, Humphris JL, Kaplan W, Jones MD, Colvin EK, Nagrial AM, Humphrey ES, Chou A, Chin VT, Chantrill LA, Mawson A, Samra JS, Kench JG, Lovell JA, Daly RJ, Merrett ND, Toon C, Epari K, Nguyen NQ, Barbour A, Zeps N, Kakkar N, Zhao F, Wu YQ, Wang M, Muzny DM, Fisher WE, Brunicardi FC, Hodges SE, Reid JG, Drummond J, Chang K, Han Y, Lewis LR, Dinh H, Buhay CJ, Beck T, Timms L, Sam M, Begley K, Brown A, Pai D, Panchal A, Buchner N, De Borja R, Denroche RE, Yung CK, Serra S, Onetto N, Mukhopadhyay D, Tsao M-S, Shaw PA, Petersen GM, Gallinger S, Hruban RH, Maitra A, Iacobuzio-Donahue CA, Schulick RD, Wolfgang CL, Morgan RA, Lawlor RT, Capelli P, Corbo V, Scardoni M, Tortora G, Tempero MA, Mann KM, Jenkins NA, Perez-Mancera PA, Adams DJ, Largaespada DA, Wessels LFA, Rust AG, Stein LD, Tuveson DA, Copeland NG, Musgrove EA, Scarpa A, Eshleman JR, Hudson TJ, Sutherland RL, Wheeler DA, Pearson JV, McPherson JD, Gibbs RA & Grimmond SM (2012) Pancreatic cancer genomes reveal aberrations in axon guidance pathway genes. Nature 491, 399-405.

86 Casazza A, Finisguerra V, Capparuccia L, Camperi A, Swiercz JM, Rizzolio S, Rolny C, Christensen C, Bertotti A, Sarotto I, Risio M, Trusolino L, Weitz J, Schneider M, Mazzone M, Comoglio PM & Tamagnone L (2010) Sema3E–Plexin D1 signaling drives human cancer cell invasiveness and metastatic spreading in mice. J Clin Invest 120, 2684-2698.

87 Tseng C-H, Murray KD, Jou M-F, Hsu S-M, Cheng H-J & Huang P-H (2011) Sema3E/plexin-D1 mediated epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in ovarian endometrioid cancer. PLoS ONE 6, e19396.

88 Christensen CR, Klingelhöfer J, Tarabykina S, Hulgaard EF, Kramerov D & Lukanidin E (1998) Transcription of a novel mouse semaphorin gene, M-semaH, correlates with the metastatic ability of mouse tumor cell lines. Cancer Res. 58, 1238-1244.

89 Martín-Satué M & Blanco J (1999) Identification of semaphorin E gene expression in metastatic human lung adenocarcinoma cells by mRNA differential display. J Surg Oncol 72, 18-23.

90 Sabag AD, Bode J, Fink D, Kigel B, Kugler W & Neufeld G (2012) Semaphorin-3D and semaphorin-3E inhibit the development of tumors from glioblastoma cells implanted in the cortex of the brain. PLoS ONE 7, e42912.

91 Christensen C, Ambartsumian N, Gilestro G, Thomsen B, Comoglio P, Tamagnone L, Guldberg P & Lukanidin E (2005) Proteolytic processing converts the repelling signal Sema3E into an inducer of invasive growth and lung metastasis. Cancer Res. 65, 6167-6177.

92 Casazza A, Kigel B, Maione F, Capparuccia L, Kessler O, Giraudo E, Mazzone M, Neufeld G & Tamagnone L (2012) Tumour growth inhibition and anti‐metastatic activity of a mutated furin‐resistant Semaphorin 3E isoform. EMBO Molecular Medicine 4, 234-250.

93 Sato N, Yamabuki T, Takano A, Koinuma J, Aragaki M, Masuda K, Ishikawa N, Kohno N, Ito H, Miyamoto M, Nakayama H, Miyagi Y, Tsuchiya E, Kondo S, Nakamura Y & Daigo Y (2010) Wnt inhibitor Dickkopf-1 as a target for passive cancer immunotherapy. Cancer Res. 70, 5326-5336.

94 Yamabuki T, Takano A, Hayama S, Ishikawa N, Kato T, Miyamoto M, Ito T, Ito H, Miyagi Y, Nakayama H, Fujita M, Hosokawa M, Tsuchiya E, Kohno N, Kondo S, Nakamura Y & Daigo Y (2007) Dikkopf-1 as a novel serologic and prognostic biomarker for lung and esophageal carcinomas. Cancer Res. 67, 2517-2525.

95 Shen Q, Fan J, Yang X-R, Tan Y, Zhao W, Xu Y, Wang N, Niu Y, Wu Z, Zhou J, Qiu S-J, Shi Y-H, Yu B, Tang N, Chu W, Wang M, Wu J, Zhang Z, Yang S, Gu J, Wang H & Qin W (2012) Serum DKK1 as a protein biomarker for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicentre study. Lancet Oncol. 13, 817-826.

96 Jiang T, Huang L & Zhang S (2013) DKK-1 in serum as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with cervical cancer. Int. J. Biol. Markers 28, 221-225.

97 Zhou S, Zhuo S, Yang X, Qin C & Wang Z (2014) Serum Dickkopf-1 expression level positively correlates with a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Diagn Pathol 9, 161.

98 Rachner TD, Thiele S, Göbel A, Browne A, Fuessel S, Erdmann K, Wirth MP, Fröhner M, Todenhöfer T, Muders MH, Kieslinger M, Rauner M & Hofbauer LC (2014) High serum levels of Dickkopf-1 are associated with a poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 14, 649.

99 Tung EK-K, Mak CK-M, Fatima S, Lo RC-L, Zhao H, Zhang C, Dai H, Poon RT-P, Yuen M-F, Lai C-L, Li J, Luk JM-C & Ng IO-L (2011) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of serum and tissue Dickkopf-1 levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver International 31, 1494-1504.

100 Sun DK, Wang L, Wang JM & Zhang P (2015) Serum Dickkopf-1 levels as a clinical and prognostic factor in patients with bladder cancer. Genet. Mol. Res. 14, 18181-18187.

101 Mabille C, Witrand AR, Degboe Y, Gennero I, Loiseau HA, Roussel M, Hebraud B, Nigon D, Attal M & Laroche M (2017) DKK1 and sclerostin are early markers of relapse in multiple myeloma. Bone.

102 Huang Y, Yang X, Zhao F, Shen Q, Wang Z, Lv X, Hu B, Yu B, Fan J & Qin W (2014) Overexpression of Dickkopf-1 predicts poor prognosis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after orthotopic liver transplantation by promoting cancer metastasis and recurrence. Med. Oncol. 31, 966.

103 Goldstein SD, Trucco M, Bautista Guzman W, Hayashi M & Loeb DM (2016) A monoclonal antibody against the Wnt signaling inhibitor dickkopf-1 inhibits osteosarcoma metastasis in a preclinical model. Oncotarget 7, 21114-21123.

104 Fulciniti M, Tassone P, Hideshima T, Vallet S, Nanjappa P, Ettenberg SA, Shen Z, Patel N, Tai Y-T, Chauhan D, Mitsiades C, Prabhala R, Raje N, Anderson KC, Stover DR & Munshi NC (2009) Anti-DKK1 mAb (BHQ880) as a potential therapeutic agent for multiple myeloma. Blood 114, 371-379.

105 Broutier L, Creveaux M, Vial J, Tortereau A, Chazot G., MacCarron M, Léon S, Pangault C, Gadot N, Colombe A, Boulland ML, Blachier J, Marie J, Traverse-Glehen A, Donzé O, Chassagne-Clément C, Salles G, Tarte K, P. Mehlen* and M. Castets* (2015) Targeting netrin-1/DCC interaction in Diffuse Large-B and Mantle Cell Lymphoma. EMBO Mol Med. 8 (2):96-104. *Co-senior-co-corresponding

Figure legends

Figure 1. The Dependence receptor paradigm.

a) Positive signaling. Ligand bound dependence receptor can trigger various survival signals such as differentiation, migration or proliferation. b) Negative signaling. In the absence of its ligand, the dependence receptor induces cell death in an active manner.

Figure 2. Signaling of cell death by   dependence receptors

Simplified view of how DRs triggers caspase dependent cell death

Figure 3. Escape of tumor cells by bypassing the survival dependence to dependence receptors.

a) Tissue homeostasis. In a limited ligand environment, aberrant proliferation is controlled by dependence receptors, which induce cell death when unbound by their specific ligands. Tumor escape can be achieved by the silencing of pro-apoptotic pathways (b)), either by the loss of the dependence receptors at the cell membrane (c) or (d) by ligand upregulation in an autocrine (by the cell itself) or paracrine (by other surrounding cells) manners.

Figure 4. Preliminary data on the phase 1 trial assessing the anti-netrin-1 mAb.

Efficacy of the netrin-1 mAb treatment in patients treated in the NP137 trial. a. Evolution of the RESIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) lesions in patient 01-10 (advanced cervical cancer) before (0) and upon treatment with NP137 (netrin-1 mAb), showing reduction of the target lesions. b. CT-scan before (Baseline) and after 2 cycles of treatment with the NP137 in patient 02-04 (endometrium adenocarcinoma).