Complexity and Analogy in Science

2012
Plenary Session
5-7 November

Complexity and Analogy in Science: Theoretical, Methodological and Epistemological Aspects

Complexity and Analogy in Science: Theoretical, Methodological and Epistemological Aspects
Illustration: Lorenzo Rumori

In the past decades scientific investigations have been quite successful by reductionistic research approaches. But scientists are ever more aware that their specific knowledge obtained so far will have to become integrated into a more holistic understanding of the reality of nature, which shows ever higher degrees of complexity and analogy. Evidence of this can be found, for example, in micro and macro physics as well as in biological systems. The Council presumes that most of our Academicians will be able to contribute with their personal view and experience to the proposed topic. This can offer a welcome occasion to learn from one another and to outline promising approaches for future scientific investigations.

The concept of complexity in science has many different meanings with regard to theoretical, methodological and epistemological aspects, while its basic meaning remains stable. It is, first of all, the theory of nonlinear complex systems, which is used with regard to physics and quantum systems as well as to cellular organisms and the brain. The aim of the Plenary Session is to explore the important concept of complexity in science in general and in different scientific disciplines. Are the concepts used analogous, or can a phenomenon be, for instance, complex from the biological point of view, but not from the physical one? Shall our practice just ignore problems we cannot currently handle – or can science render apparently complex systems in simple underlying theories? Furthermore, is there a difference between complex and complicated such that some complex systems are not actually complicated even though all complicated systems are indeed complex? In general, complexity has become an important area of research in several disciplines in the last decades. For instance, the complexity and the ensuing unpredictability of weather systems has been known for a long time.

In systemic approaches to fully understand functions and evolution of life, one may have

... Read all

In the past decades scientific investigations have been quite successful by reductionistic research approaches. But scientists are ever more aware that their specific knowledge obtained so far will have to become integrated into a more holistic understanding of the reality of nature, which shows ever higher degrees of complexity and analogy. Evidence of this can be found, for example, in micro and macro physics as well as in biological systems. The Council presumes that most of our Academicians will be able to contribute with their personal view and experience to the proposed topic. This can offer a welcome occasion to learn from one another and to outline promising approaches for future scientific investigations.

The concept of complexity in science has many different meanings with regard to theoretical, methodological and epistemological aspects, while its basic meaning remains stable. It is, first of all, the theory of nonlinear complex systems, which is used with regard to physics and quantum systems as well as to cellular organisms and the brain. The aim of the Plenary Session is to explore the important concept of complexity in science in general and in different scientific disciplines. Are the concepts used analogous, or can a phenomenon be, for instance, complex from the biological point of view, but not from the physical one? Shall our practice just ignore problems we cannot currently handle – or can science render apparently complex systems in simple underlying theories? Furthermore, is there a difference between complex and complicated such that some complex systems are not actually complicated even though all complicated systems are indeed complex? In general, complexity has become an important area of research in several disciplines in the last decades. For instance, the complexity and the ensuing unpredictability of weather systems has been known for a long time.

In systemic approaches to fully understand functions and evolution of life, one may have to consider each individual organism as a complex system of biological functions, then each ecosystem as a complex system of mutually interactive organisms belonging to different species, and finally, the entire living world together with its different habitats as a large planetary system of steady, but slow, co-evolution.

Werner Arber & Jürgen Mittelstraß

Read Less

List of Participants

Prof. Werner Arber
Prof. Vanderlei S. Bagnato
Prof. Antonio M. Battro
Prof. Enrico Berti
Prof. Thierry Boon-Falleur
Prof. Dr. Joachim von Braun
Prof. Luis A. Caffarelli
H.E. Card. Georges M.M. Cottier
Prof. Paul J. Crutzen
Prof. Stanislas Dehaene
Prof. Edward M. De Robertis
Prof. Gerhard L. Ertl
Prof. José G. Funes, SJ
Prof. Theodor W. Hänsch
Prof. Michał Heller
Prof. Krishnaswamy Kasturirangan
Prof. Pierre Léna
Prof. Jean-Michel Maldamé
Prof. Yuri I. Manin
Prof. Jürgen Mittelstraß
Prof. Mario J. Molina
Prof. Rudolf Muradyan
Prof. William D. Phillips
Prof. Ingo Potrykus
Prof. Yves Quéré
Prof. Veerabhadran Ramanathan
Prof. Chintamani N.R. Rao
Prof. Martin J. Rees
Prof. Ignacio Rodríguez-Iturbe
H.E. Msgr. Marcelo Sánchez Sorondo
Prof. Michael Sela
Prof. Wolf J. Singer
Prof. Hans Tuppy
Prof. Rafael Vicuña
Prof. Antonino Zichichi

Pius XI Medal Award
Prof. Trees-Juen Chuang
Prof. Ulrich Pöschl